Jump to content

European Securities and Markets Authority

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mako001 (talk | contribs) at 07:31, 11 February 2024 (Removed unnecessary nowiki from URL to improve accessibility, also moved persistent IDs to proper template. (via WP:JWB)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

European Securities and Markets Authority
ESMA Logo
Agency overview
Formed1 January 2011 (2011-01-01)
Preceding
JurisdictionEuropean Union
HeadquartersParis, France
Agency executives
  • Verena Ross, Chairperson
  • Natasha Cazenave, Executive Director
Key document
Websitewww.esma.europa.eu

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is an independent European Union Authority located in Paris.[1]

ESMA replaced the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) on 1 January 2011. It is one of the three new European Supervisory Authorities set up within the European System of Financial Supervisors.

Overview

ESMA’s birth is intimately intertwined with the 2008 financial crisis and the 2010 Eurozone crisis. At the light of these major turmoils, the prevailing EU financial supervision framework put on place by Lamfalussy did not stand the shock and was replaced by De Larosière regulatory framework. Therefore, what was known as the level 3 Lamfalussy agencies, the 3L3 Committees (CESR, CEIOPS, CEBS) in this four level framework, were taken over by the current European Supervisory Authorities (ESA are composed of ESMA, EIOPA, EBA) in the European System of Financial Supervision (ESFS) launched in 2011 in answer to the debt crisis.[2]

However, this incremental change was subject to a whole new flow of criticism treating about the EU administrative landscape and, more specifically, the literature around agencification. In fact, scholars studied the rise of EU agencies with executive powers through a critical lens as it raised questions on the democratic principle of the delegation of these powers to external agents [2]), the threat toward the institutional balance of the EU,[3] the impact on the European Parliament and the council of the EU co-decision process, [4] the fragmentation it can cause within member states as capitals battle to host them.[5]

ESMA started the first page of its history and enjoyed a succession of executive delegations from the commission starting with the Omnibus I (2010) and Omnibus II (2011), which made the ESA operational and gave ESMA the role of direct supervisor of Credit Rating Agencies and trade repositories. Similarly, ESMA's role in overseeing ESG rating providers can help ensure consistency in how these ratings are applied and interpreted across the European Union.In 2012, its competences were enhanced through the EU regulation on short selling and credit defaults swaps. The year 2014 marked an intensive regulatory pressure on financial markets. The MiFID II and MiFIR gave ESMA the responsibility of implementing technical standards in the financial market. Its mandate includes investor protection and financial integrity and transparency with the Market abuse regulation (MAR), which is increasingly tied to ESG factors. Ensuring that ESG ratings are reliable and not misleading is an essential part of this role.[6]

As of its growing power, they are heavily criticized by some member states. The most vocal of them were the former EU country: UK. As a matter of fact, the growing weight of the agency was seen as a threat to national sovereignty and the matter grew to a litigation process in front of the European Court of Justice on the particular case of the possibility of ESMA to block short-sellings in time of crisis. UK argument, based on the Meroni case (case 9-56[7]), was that this delegation of power was anti-constitutional and was a breach to national sovereignty. However, the ECJ held against UK in this matter reassuring ESMA of outmost trust in dealing with financial regulations in case of emergency.

Each of these regulations and judgements have served as a springboard and settled ESMA as a key player in the financial realm regulatory framework.However, if ESMA is said to be accountable, independent and competent in EU financial supervision, a glance on its relations and network signals potential conflict of interests while dealing with ESG investing. The surveillance of the ESMA is up the European parliament that still has a double discourse regarding agencification and might use this supervisory power for the sake of advancing a set of personal preferred policies. ESMA works in the field of securities legislation and regulation to improve the functioning of financial markets in Europe, strengthening investor protection and co-operation between national competent authorities.

The idea behind ESMA is to establish an "EU-wide financial markets watchdog". One of its direct supervision tasks is to regulate credit rating agencies. In 2010, credit rating agencies were criticized for the lack of transparency in their assessments and for a possible conflict of interest. At the same time, the impact of the assigned ratings became significant not only for companies and banks but also for states.[8]

In October 2017, ESMA organised its first conference which was held in Paris. The event examined issues critical to European financial markets and was attended by 350 participants.[9]

ESMA's product intervention measures

On 1 August 2018, the ESMA implemented modified trading restrictions concerning contracts for difference (CFDs) and spread betting for retail clients. The most significant change was that binary options will be completely banned, while the CFD leverage that retail clients can trade with will be restricted to 30:1 and 2:1, depending on the volatility of the underlying asset traded.[10] These restrictions applied to traders categorized as retail investors only. Experienced traders, which fall under the category of professional clients, were excluded. This also meant that professional clients did not receive the same investor protections as retail investors.[11] The restrictions, initially imposed as a temporary measure, were renewed on 1 February 2019 ,for a further three-month period.[12] On 31 July 2019, the ESMA announced that it will not renew the restrictions after they expire on 1 August 2019, as all the EU member countries have managed to implement similar restrictions on the national level.[13]

ESMA's supervision of ESG rating activities

The addition of overseeing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) rating providers to the European Securities and Markets Authority's (ESMA) responsibilities can be seen as a coherent extension of its existing mandate and expertise. Its association through the proposal of a regulation on ESG ratings activities integrity and transparency therefore aligns with the aim to concentrate a comprehensive EU Finance Single Rulebook on the hand of ESMA[14][15].ESMA would have supervisory powers over ESG rating providers in addition to the supervision of credit rating agencies. Since there are similarities between supervisory functions, ESMA will have much more facilitated future supervision.[16]

Under the proposed regulations, any entity wishing to offer Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) rating services within the European Union must obtain official authorization. Entities based in the EU are obliged to seek this authorization from the European Securities and Markets Authority. ESMA will grant authorization upon determining that the applicant meets the criteria outlined in the Proposal and the right to apply fines in case of non-compliance to the set of requirements on quality, integrity, independence and transparency.[17]

Questions and answers (Q&A)

To ensure the consistent day-to-day application of Union law within ESMA's remit, one of the organisations' key contributions is the production and maintenance of Q&As. To open the process, ESMA launched in February 2017 a new process allowing stakeholders to submit a Q&A. Once scrutinised, if these Q&As are selected, they are published in English on ESMA's website.[18]

Leadership

Chair:

  • Verena Ross (since 1 November 2021)
  • Anneli Tuominen (interim chair, 2021)
  • Steven Maijoor (1 April 2011 - 31 March 2021)

Vice-Chair:

  • Vojtěch Belling (since 21 November 2022)
  • Erik Thedéen (December 2021 - November 2022)
  • Anneli Tuominen (2016 - 2022)

Executive Director:

  • Natasha Cazenave (1 June 2021)
  • Verena Ross (2011-2021)

See also

References

  1. ^ "European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)". Thomson Reuters Practical Law. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  2. ^ a b Spendzharova, Aneta (March 2012). "Is More 'Brussels' the Solution? New European Union Member States' Preferences about the European Financial Architecture*". JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 50 (2): 315–334. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02208.x. ISSN 0021-9886. S2CID 152473539.
  3. ^ Chamon, Merijn (September 2010). "EU Agencies: Does the Meroni Doctrine Make Sense?". Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 17 (3): 281–305. doi:10.1177/1023263x1001700304. hdl:1854/LU-1096117. ISSN 1023-263X. S2CID 156045399.
  4. ^ Lord, Christopher (September 2011). "The European Parliament and the legitimation of agencification". Journal of European Public Policy. 18 (6): 909–925. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.593317. ISSN 1350-1763. S2CID 153510711.
  5. ^ Lord, C. (2011). The European Parliament and the legitimation of agencification. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 909-925.
  6. ^ Spendzharova, A. (2012), Is More ‘Brussels’ the Solution? New European Union Member States' Preferences about the European Financial Architecture. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50: 315-334. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02208.x
  7. ^ "Meronie & Co., Industrie Metallurgiche, Società in Accomandita Semplice v. The High Authority". International Law Reports. 25: 454–457. 1963. doi:10.1017/cbo9781316151525.060. ISSN 0309-0671. S2CID 249007341.
  8. ^ "EU plans new financial regulator for rating agencies". BBC News. 2 June 2010. Retrieved 18 April 2014.
  9. ^ "Steven Maijoor on the State of European Financial Markets". www.esma.europa.eu. Retrieved 11 October 2018.
  10. ^ "ESMA ADOPTS FINAL PRODUCT INTERVENTION MEASURES ON CFDS AND BINARY OPTIONS". Europa.eu. 1 June 2018. Retrieved 10 August 2018.
  11. ^ "ESMA's product intervention measures in relation to CFDs and binary options offered to retail investors" (PDF). Europa.eu. 27 March 2018. Retrieved 18 August 2018.
  12. ^ "ESMA to renew restrictions on CFDs for a further three months from 1 February 2019". www.esma.europa.eu. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
  13. ^ "ESMA ceases renewal of product intervention measures relating to contracts for differences". www.esma.europa.eu. Retrieved 10 September 2019.
  14. ^ Moloney, Niamh (March 2011). "The European Securities and Markets Authority and Institutional Design for the EU Financial Market — A Tale of Two Competences: Part (1) Rule-Making". European Business Organization Law Review. 12 (1): 41–86. doi:10.1017/s1566752911100026. ISSN 1566-7529.
  15. ^ Lord, C. (2011). The European Parliament and the legitimation of agencification. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 909-925.
  16. ^ Rogge, E., & Ohnesorge, L. (2022). The Role of ESG Rating Agencies and Market Efficiency in Europe's Climate Policy. Hastings Env't LJ, 28, 113.
  17. ^ https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:1243bcf3-0ac8-11ee-b12e-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
  18. ^ "Questions and Answers". www.esma.europa.eu. Retrieved 13 September 2019.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=European_Securities_and_Markets_Authority&oldid=1206121466"