2023 San Antonio mayoral election: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 05:5805:58, 28 May 2024‎ LucasBrown talk contribs‎ 6,065 bytes +70‎ No edit summary undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

curprev 16:2616:26, 21 May 2024‎ Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk contribs‎ 5,995 bytes +56‎ Beginning to implement an agreement discussed a while ago of removing nonpartisan from the infobox undo

curprev 22:4322:43, 28 February 2024‎ BottleOfChocolateMilk talk contribs‎ 5,939 bytes +14‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 22:2922:29, 28 February 2024‎ Namiba talk contribs‎ 5,925 bytes +41‎ added Category:21st century in San Antonio using HotCat undo

curprev 06:0306:03, 12 January 2024‎ BottleOfChocolateMilk talk contribs‎ 5,884 bytes −44‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 16:3616:36, 11 December 2023‎ Jessicapierce talk contribs‎ m 5,928 bytes −7‎ minor copy edits undo
curprev 14:4814:48, 11 December 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,935 bytes +45‎ Restored revision 1185352757 by Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk): Uncited changes without proper explanation undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 05:1805:18, 11 December 2023‎ Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk contribs‎ 5,890 bytes −45‎ texas election custom is to just have the grey only, with no "Nonpartisan" label. undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 04:5404:54, 16 November 2023‎ Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk contribs‎ 5,935 bytes −13‎ more recent image undo

curprev 21:4321:43, 25 October 2023‎ Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk contribs‎ 5,948 bytes −64‎ Undid revision 1180224816 by BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) - unexplained revert. Returning to status quo. Creates too much wasted space when there are not photos. undo Tag: Undo

curprev 07:3807:38, 15 October 2023‎ BottleOfChocolateMilk talk contribs‎ 6,012 bytes +64‎ Undid revision 1165809181 by SanAnMan (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 07:2507:25, 15 October 2023‎ Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk contribs‎ m 5,948 bytes +4‎ ce undo

curprev 13:1713:17, 13 September 2023‎ 104.160.99.15 talk‎ 5,944 bytes +11‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 00:3200:32, 8 September 2023‎ Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs‎ 5,933 bytes +39‎ add "use mdy dates" template undo Tag: AWB

curprev 15:0915:09, 17 July 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,894 bytes −64‎ Reverted good faith edits by BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk): Disagree with your opinion, it looks weird when the infobox is oversized for no good reason. Since there are no photos for these candidates, it looks less clunky this way undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
curprev 14:1914:19, 17 July 2023‎ BottleOfChocolateMilk talk contribs‎ 5,958 bytes +64‎ Undid revision 1165723234 by Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) Yes there is. It looks weird if the columns are different sizes undo Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 01:0401:04, 17 July 2023‎ Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk contribs‎ 5,894 bytes −64‎ no need for these big spaces undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 00:1400:14, 17 July 2023‎ Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk contribs‎ m 5,958 bytes +3‎ more accurate undo

curprev 01:5901:59, 8 July 2023‎ BottleOfChocolateMilk talk contribs‎ 5,955 bytes +197‎ There is a clear consensus among editors for this provision, judging by the overwhelming majority of pages that use it. You have not provided an explanation for why that trend should not continue on this page other than "those people are irrelevant," which is completely subjective and biased. Rather than reverting again, start a discussion on the talk page undo Tag: Undo

curprev 21:4721:47, 7 July 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,758 bytes +115‎ in an attempt to provide a good faith compromise, added the second-place finisher to the infobox undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 21:0521:05, 7 July 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,643 bytes −312‎ Reverted good faith edits by BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk): WP:OSE argument undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
curprev 20:5620:56, 7 July 2023‎ BottleOfChocolateMilk talk contribs‎ 5,955 bytes +312‎ Undid revision 1159833413 by SanAnMan (talk) I invite you to check Wikipedia pages for other local nonpartisan elections and you will see every candidate who got >5% in the infobox. Examples: 2023 Tampa mayoral election 2023 Fort Worth mayoral election 2021 Albuquerque mayoral election 2021 Anchorage mayoral election 2021 Mobile mayoral election 2021 Saint Paul mayoral election 2019 Denver mayoral election undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 20:3920:39, 12 June 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,643 bytes −312‎ 5% rule only applies specifically to third party candidates, and there are none in Texas municipal elections since it is nonpartisan undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 18:5318:53, 13 May 2023‎ BottleOfChocolateMilk talk contribs‎ 5,955 bytes +230‎ Undid revision 1154513347 by SanAnMan (talk) WP:Five percent rule clearly states that it applies to *every* election. Since when does every WP rule have to be specifically "established" for every single individual type of election? Look at pretty much any WP page for a "small municipal election" and you'll see that everyone who crossed 5% made the infobox regardless of "notability." Example: 2021 Fort Worth mayoral election undo Tag: Undo
curprev 00:3000:30, 13 May 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,725 bytes −230‎ Reverted good faith edits by BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk): 5% rule has not been established to apply in small municipal elections undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

curprev 23:0623:06, 12 May 2023‎ BottleOfChocolateMilk talk contribs‎ 5,955 bytes +230‎ Undid revision 1154348755 by SanAnMan (talk) Per WP:Five percent rule, any candidate who surpasses 5% of the vote gets to be in the infobox. It doesn't matter if they're "notable" undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 21:4721:47, 11 May 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,725 bytes −230‎ Reverted good faith edits by DukeOfDelTaco (talk): None of these candidates are notable and not worthy of infobox inclusion undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
curprev 21:4121:41, 11 May 2023‎ DukeOfDelTaco talk contribs‎ 5,955 bytes +230‎ Included other candidates who passed >5% threshold in infobox undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 14:0814:08, 10 May 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,725 bytes −46‎ cat fix undo
curprev 13:2813:28, 10 May 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,771 bytes 0‎ →‎Results: total count corrected undo
curprev 13:2713:27, 10 May 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,771 bytes +181‎ →‎Results: adjust table, add note undo Tag: nowiki added

curprev 19:5819:58, 9 May 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,590 bytes +20‎ →‎Candidates: add candidate nickname undo
curprev 19:4319:43, 9 May 2023‎ SanAnMan talk contribs‎ 5,570 bytes +921‎ updated election table, per previous election the unofficial results are valid for posting undo

curprev 02:2902:29, 11 April 2023‎ RussBot talk contribs‎ m 4,187 bytes +11‎ Robot: fix links to disambiguation page Nonpartisan undo

28 May 2024

21 May 2024

28 February 2024

12 January 2024

11 December 2023

16 November 2023

25 October 2023

15 October 2023

13 September 2023

8 September 2023

17 July 2023

8 July 2023

7 July 2023

12 June 2023

13 May 2023

12 May 2023

11 May 2023

10 May 2023

9 May 2023

8 May 2023

7 May 2023

11 April 2023

23 February 2023